Browsing archives for April, 2010

Eat your frog!

Productivity 30 April 2010 | 0 Comments

I love this productivity tip from Mark Twain via Gina Trapani (amongst others): eat your frog!

What this means is to do your worst task first, every day. Identify the day before what you really don’t want to get around to doing the next day, the task you secretly hope you’ll run out of time for so you don’t have to do it. Do it at the start of the day (it can’t be worse than eating a live frog) and then it’s done, you feel great, and you don’t have it dragging you down all day.

A couple of modifications: I don’t do this every single day (I don’t always have a particularly unpleasant frog!) so the days when I do do it, it really feels good. Also, making a list of the one or two things I really want to get done the next day, the night before, really helps. And finally, think GTD-style – maybe the task is so big and horrible because it’s large, amorphous and uncontrolled. If you only have half an hour before that morning meeting, why not break the task down into small pieces, do anything that’s quick and easy, and come back to it later? You’ll feel good because you’ve met your frog head-on.

Tagged in , , ,

Going global with an online business

Startups 28 April 2010 | 1 Comment

This is a guest post by Christian Arno.

Starting up your own business in the middle of a global economic downturn may seem like insanity, but in reality the recession has created a myriad of opportunities for smart entrepreneurs with a truly Unique Selling Point (USP), a clever marketing strategy and an eye for the internet.

For most start-up companies, the point of departure is the local market, and if they find success there, then they’ll look at a gradual expansion into foreign markets. But with the global spread of internet access, this no longer need be the case. There’s money to be made all over the world – in fact, worldwide e-commerce grew by 12.9% in the past year. Any Jack or Jill with a great idea can create a global company from their bedroom with little more than a computer, an internet connection and a little savvy with regards to multilingual website design and online marketing strategies.

In fact, basing your business almost entirely online makes the most sense of all, as you can get a business up and running for very little initial outlay, which is crucial for most start-up businesses operating on minimal capital. You can also market your products and brand very effectively for very little expense, by using Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) and Pay-Per-Click (PPC) strategies. SEO means, at its most basic, ensuring that the most popular keywords used to search for products like yours are placed prominently in your titles and introductory copy, so that the search engine bots will pick up these terms when scanning your page and boost you up the search rankings. This is especially useful for non-English language search engines, as there is far less keyword saturation on non-English pages, thereby giving your website a better chance of reaching top of the rank.

PPC advertising is the other key online marketing strategy, and it requires minimal expense to figure out how to maximise your Return on Investment (RoI). By setting up PPC advertising campaigns across a range of search engines and with a range of specific keywords, you can then set your monthly budget for PPC advertising to a nominal amount, say €20, and then at the end of each month look at the results of which keywords and engines brought in the most click-through traffic and thus tailor your campaign and expenditure accordingly.

The next step to online business success is to take advantage of the internet’s global reach and expand your concept of your potential client base beyond your national boundaries and out into the world. English may be the mother-tongue of the internet, but today more than 78% of internet users speak a first-language other than English– in fact, Chinese speakers are rapidly about to overtake English speakers, with 384 million Chinese-speaking internet users gunning for the 478 million English speakers (Internetworldstats.com).

Add to those facts research that found that 85% of consumers won’t buy a product if they can’t access information about it in their first language (Common Sense Advisory, 2006), and you have a powerful argument for localising your web presence for each international market you plan to target.

The next question, then, is where internationally would there be a potential market for your products? Figuring out where to target your online marketing efforts is absolutely essential, as to effectively reach each of those individual markets you will need to create individual localised Top Level Domains for each one; so, for instance, you’ll have your www.mybusiness.ch, then for China www.mybusiness.cn, and www.mybusiness.in for India, etc.

This is where it helps again to operate solely online – you can open an office in each of these countries with just one local employee at a computer at the other end, to advise on language, tone, website design, local consumer behaviour and effective marketing strategies. It’s absolutely essential to make sure that your website design and language-use is unrecognisable from that of a local company – internet users are savvy, and if your website is difficult to navigate or contains copy that has grammatical errors or uses outmoded or irrelevant terminology then there’s no chance they’ll be handing their details over for a purchase.

If you don’t have the capital to be opening up offices in each target country then your next best step is to work with freelance translators to make sure that your copy is perfect for each market – you want to avoid any potential translation embarrassments, such as when American chicken entrepreneur Frank Perdue’s slogan ‘It takes a tough man to make a tender chicken’ was translated into Spanish for Mexican billboards, apparently without consulting any native Spanish speakers, for the resulting caption informed bemused Mexican readers that ‘It takes a hard man to make a chicken aroused.’

It can also help to hire a company that specialises in website localisation and multilingual SEO – while there may be some initial expense involved, consider that the Localization Industry Standards Association found recently that each dollar invested in localisation reaped a $25 return, and you’ll see why going online and global with your business is not only a smart way to save money, it’s also the smartest way to make money.

About the author:

Christian Arno is the founder and managing director of global translation provider Lingo24, which works across four continents. Follow Christian on Twitter: @Lingo24chr.

Tagged in , , , , ,

Hacker Challenge: The Apprentice meets Startup Weekend meets Y Combinator

Startups 24 April 2010 | 1 Comment

A fledgling idea that I’m throwing out there for feedback, comments and refinement.

Take sixteen entrepreneurial hackers.

Follow the standard formula: give them somewhere awesome to live (but force them to live together), a dream workspace, and something to strive towards.

The ultimate reward: $100,000 of seed funding, $50,000 technology funding donated by a sponsor, office space, living space, free hosting, $50,000 of marketing donated, etc etc.

The catch? They have to survive the weekly challenges before they get to the final creation stage.

The challenges are technical and business focused. Similar to the Apprentice, each week tests a different aspect of these hackers’ coding skills and business thinking. From developing an iPhone app prototype and business case pitch in a week, to working with the newly released Twitter API, to finding an innovative green solution to a specific problem… An expert in the relevant area joins the teams each week to help with the tech disconnect, but part of the test is how fast these guys can learn and adapt. Some challenges could be solo but the main idea is getting to know the teams.

The aim is to test the hackers on their ability to hack under pressure as well as their ability to assimilate other business skills, to communicate and pitch, and to work in teams with other type-A personalities. Each week a project manager gets chosen, and the two semi-finalists pick their own full teams from the candidates to create a much more detailed app and business idea, to report back in a month (or week?) – the winning team then gets to create that product with mentoring, cash and invaluable connections.

From marketing to pitch training as well as a ton of challenges around assimilating new technology and developing under pressure, this show should be entertaining and useful to hackers and non-hackers at home. The training sessions, guest speakers, tech guides and even the code developed by the teams should be available online for people to follow along. Hell, even If I Can Dream-style 24/7 ability to follow along, interact via Twitter etc.

Aside: This could also be used as a fairly ‘interesting’ way to select candidates for a job within a large tech company, no? Or to select Y Combinator companies ;)

I’m not sure if non-programmers (or people like me who can program but have moved away from it and prefer to do other things) should be included in the teams. The aim is to train hackers to create awesome startups, both those participating and those watching along. This means covering a lot of business topics as well as development best practices, concepts like ’ship and iterate’, lean startup, customer development, customer management etc.

I think there’s a lot of value to creating a mixed set of participants, front-end guys and girls, back-end, Rails, PHP, Python, C, etc. It just gets interesting when people get voted off if the skillsets don’t end up complementary…

Anyway, there’s the idea. It could even be started fairly low budget – it doesn’t have to be a NBC show. We’d need a team to get together to run it, design challenges, raise funding for the live-in hack-fest and think about some of the technology problems that we’d have to overcome. But I think it’d be pretty cool, even if a little derivative.

Tagged in , , , , ,

One step closer to automagic: twitter based implicit checkins

Social Media 15 April 2010 | 0 Comments

At Twitter’s Chirp conference today, the company announced an interesting move. Currently, you can attach a location to your tweets, and not just co-ordinates either; you can boast your neighbourhood and city.

The logical extension, which Twitter will roll out this quarter, is attaching places to tweets. Hmm, sounds somewhat familiar…

Thing is, this leads to an interesting gap. Instead of check-in fatigue, this could reduce the need to check in at venues; send a tweet, and it gets you automatically checked in at that venue, maybe even posting your tweet as a tip for that place.

One issue is the back-channel that occurs when you check in using a service like Foursquare. It’s good to get points and badges and shiny things; if check-ins are automatic, you don’t get any of that.

Still, it’s a nice concept for someone to implement, one day. Someone who isn’t me.

Tagged in , , ,

Using sketchy sentiment to pump up your post count

Online 7 April 2010 | 0 Comments

Finally, a post topic that combines both sentiment analysis and the meta-world of professional blogging!

I usually like TechCrunch for the most part, but these two articles have annoyed me: ‘Sentiment is split on the iPad‘ and ‘More iPad Sentiment Analysis‘. Both use poor, crude methods of sentiment analysis to produce posts full of fluff and pretty graphs. Result? Whatever point the blogger wanted to make. (You know what they say about statistics).

A quick rundown of the problems: Spurious classification algorithms, poor data sizes, and non-credible results. An algorithm that analyses every piece of traffic on Twitter and comes up with “51% positive, 49% negative” is Just Plain Wrong. There’s going to be a ton of stuff in the middle, unclassifiable, undecided, even just retweets of blog posts with the word in the title, and any graph should reflect that as well. Stripping out the neutral, a result of 51/49 just seems completely nonsensical to me, and I’ve been working with Twitter sentiment for a long time now.

It’d also be very interesting to know what methods the classifiers use, probably available with some digging, but I fear it’s manual keyword lists that some poor sod had to draw up — “hmm, I think if someone says the iPad is ’stupid’ that’s probably negative, yah?”.

Attensity does better, but what on earth does “not thrilled” mean (weak negative?) and again, where’s the neutral or noise aspect? It’s valuable to know just how many tweets were about the iPad, and how many of those were about sentiment. What if a TechCrunch headline with a negative word got retweeted 2000 times? That’s what we in the trade call “skew”. Plus, classifying on a small sample is just crazy. Why? Surely it can’t be computational limits; were these the only tweets with sentiment information? That’s useful data! Why throw it all away…

It also looks like there are some great leaps in logic in terms of distinguishing between “Like the iPad because it might replace iPhone” and “Don’t like the iPad because it won’t replace my iPhone”. How do you automatically extract the difference between “Can’t replace battery” and praise for the battery life? Sigh.

Plus, there’s the key mistake of not showing error, accuracy bounds, or mistakes. Both posts assume the algorithms are 100% correct. While that makes for some pretty graphs, it just isn’t true, and with no idea of sample size or result size (e.g. for the battery category above) then a result of 5% could just mean one out of a total of twenty tweets with the word battery in was negative. It’s the same for intent to purchase. Not every tweet will have any kind of intent, so if you just took the tweets containing “will” “buy” “iPad” or “won’t” “buy” “iPad”,

Of course, the reason I’m most annoyed at these posts is that I could have helped put together a custom dataset and classifier to provide much more detailed data, and didn’t. But while I can’t go back in time and change things, I can at least point out the flaws in using off the shelf graphs to meet your daily post quota as a pro-blogger.

Tagged in , , , ,