<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>trendpreneur &#187; guerrilla marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trendpreneur.com/tag/guerrilla-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trendpreneur.com</link>
	<description>innovating is a lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:18:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is #moonfruit a good strategy?</title>
		<link>http://www.trendpreneur.com/online/social-media-online/is-moonfruit-a-good-strategy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.trendpreneur.com/online/social-media-online/is-moonfruit-a-good-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jennie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#moonfruit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guerrilla marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media promotion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trendpreneur.com/?p=661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting example of the boundaries between spam and promotion: #moonfruit. By tweeting this hashtag, Twitterers are entered into a daily prize draw to win a Macbook Pro. Mashable thinks they&#8217;re doing this right (compared to other failed tweet-about-us campaigns).
What are the key ingredients for success?

Give away something that makes people froth at the mouth. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting example of the boundaries between spam and promotion: #moonfruit. By tweeting this hashtag, Twitterers are entered into a daily prize draw to win a Macbook Pro. Mashable thinks <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/07/01/moonfruit-macbook/">they&#8217;re doing this right</a> (compared to other failed tweet-about-us campaigns).</p>
<p>What are the key ingredients for success?</p>
<ol>
<li>Give away something that makes people froth at the mouth. (Apple products tend to have this effect.)</li>
<li>Encourage multiple tweets, over time, to ensure constant visibility among trending topics (Daily draw only uses the previous day&#8217;s tweets, so people have to keep tweeting to win.)</li>
<li>Have visible, happy, real, winners.</li>
</ol>
<p>Yet this has annoyed people, as it&#8217;s encouraged a flurry of spammy messages &#8211; leading to the question &#8216;will he who spams most win?&#8217;. Is the draw normalised? Does it take into account multiple accounts, or syndicates? There are so many ways to game something like this, it&#8217;s fortunate it&#8217;s only a 10-day promotion.</p>
<p>Will it leave a nasty taste in some people&#8217;s mouths? Undoubtedly. But it&#8217;s certainly got Twitter talking about Moonfruit. Is there no such thing as bad publicity? Sentiment classification, or other filtering, might help us understand what people <em>think</em> about Moonfruit &#8211; or whether they just want to win a laptop. (Almost undoubtedly the latter, no?) But when you&#8217;re just after volume, does the content matter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trendpreneur.com/online/social-media-online/is-moonfruit-a-good-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
